“Not Concerned About War” – Trump, Israel and the Iran 60‑Day Ultimatum

“Not Concerned About War” – Trump, Israel and the Iran 60‑Day Ultimatum

📅 Timeline & Key Events

• ~April 12, 2025 – Then–President Trump reportedly sent Iran a letter, giving Tehran 60 days to strike a nuclear deal or face potential military action 

• June 13, 2025 – That 60‑day deadline elapsed. The next day, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, bombing over 100 Iranian military and nuclear sites, killing senior IRGC commanders and nuclear scientists 

• Later June 13 – Iran retaliated with waves of ballistic missiles and drones targeting Israel, injuring and killing civilians in Tel Aviv and other cities; Israel and the U.S. reportedly used missile-defense systems .

• Trump's Response – He confirmed awareness of the Israeli strike, praised it as “excellent,” and reiterated that Iran still has a chance to negotiate—even a day past his 60‑day ultimatum 

---

🎙️ What Trump Says (and What It Means)

✅ “I always knew the date… gave Iran 60 days.”

Trump asserted he was fully briefed and deliberately issued the ultimatum to Iran. He emphasizes the goal was to pressure them diplomatically—not provoke war—though he stands by Israel’s military steps .

⚠️ “Not concerned about war”

In his Reuters interview on June 13, Trump downplayed the risk of a full-blown war—stating “not concerned.” Instead, he framed his ultimatum as a push to force Iran back to the negotiating table .

☝️ “Still not too late for talks”

Trump implied that diplomacy remains on the table. He noted that discussions were still scheduled in Oman—after the deadline passed. His dual-track approach signals both pressure and negotiation 

---

⚔️ Regional Dynamics & Risks

Israel

Prime Minister Netanyahu affirmed his admiration for Trump’s stance, stressing that Israel will strike “as long as necessary” to neutralize the Iranian nuclear threat .

Iran

Iranian leadership—especially Ayatollah Khamenei—denounced the ultimatum as “deception.” Tehran remains defiant, asserting its right to enrich uranium and taking steps to bolster nuclear capacity .

U.S. Policy

Trump’s “maximum pressure” resumed—economic sanctions, military readiness via carrier strike groups, and hardline rhetoric—all aimed at forcing concessions .

Global players like the UN, EU, and major powers are calling for calm—but oil markets have already reacted to the tensions .

---

🔍 Why It Matters for Your Readers

Topic	Why It’s Significant
Diplomacy vs. Warfare	Trump’s dual approach—threatening military force while keeping diplomacy open—shows how modern foreign policy mixes brinkmanship with negotiation.
Nuclear Non-Proliferation	The deadline aligned with frustration over Iran’s enrichment. Whether deterrence or diplomacy wins will shape global nuclear norms.
Regional Fallout	The escalation could drag in proxies like Hezbollah, or destabilize oil prices and economies far beyond the Middle East.
Power Politics	Trump’s prominent role—endorsing military action yet claiming neutrality—reinforces how the U.S. remains central in regional strategic moves.